Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaw Win Htut
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Nomination Withdrawn, per below. Non-admin closure. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 02:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Zaw Win Htut[edit]
Tagged as non-notabe last month. The article looks sort of like an advertisement, and does not containany third-party reliable sources. Because of this, I feel the subject in question is not-notable.
Article now has some references which now prove she is notable. I withdraw my nomination with immediate effect. D.M.N. (talk) 19:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Article needs cleanup and referencing but this and this provide significant coverage in reliable sources. Davewild (talk) 19:11, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Instead of saying you'll withdraw your nom, why not take the given references and add them yourself? It'll take the same amount of effort. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
- Keep I fixed the ref section and added some referenced content. Maybe that will get the ball rolling. - Operknockity (talk) 21:28, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - seems to easily meet notability now. matt91486 (talk) 02:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The subject appears to satisfy WP:MUSIC. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:28, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Davewild, I agree that the subject meets WP:MUSIC criteria. (jarbarf) (talk) 03:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.