Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zato

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 20:18, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zato[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N for products. No relevant 3rd party sources can be found. Article is written like promotional material. This article is essentially a recreation of a previously PRODed article Zato ESB. HighKing (talk) 15:55, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:41, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A promotional-sounding article; no WP:RS references in the article or found on Google, Highbeam, Questia. Fails WP:NSOFT. AllyD (talk) 19:18, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No reliable sources, no indication of notability of this software, and a search did not reveal significant RS coverage. Also, created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 14:07, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.