Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zari Hassan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Vanamonde (Talk) 00:58, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zari Hassan[edit]

Zari Hassan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

the topic of this article Fails Wikipedia Notability rules .. WHEN it comes to music or business woman , there is nothing to talk about , it Fails GNG, WP:MUSICBIO . NO evidence of Notability Found Samat lib (talk) 11:47, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:07, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:07, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:11, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:12, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Appears to be another case of WP:IDONOTLIKEIT by this nominator. She passes our general notability guidelines and has been covered in major mainstream publications in Africa, for example:
and her relationship with Diamond Platnumz was covered in reliable secondary sources.[1][2][3][4][5]
I'm sure a more in-depth non-English search would also bring up some more. Yes, she's a socialite and businessperson but she's a famous person, that is for sure who passes GNG. Missvain (talk) 22:41, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep no valid reason for deletion offered and sources have been obviously demonstrated. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:04, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment the sources provided are from a single body related source - The Standard , No significant discussion of her music , still there is NO evidence of Notability , Fails GNG, WP:MUSICBIO ; WHEN it comes to music or business woman , there is nothing to talk about , it Fails GNG, WP:MUSICBIO . Samat lib (talk) 08:20, 20 December 2020 (UTC
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Clearly meets the level of sourcing required by GNG. EggRoll97 (talk) 23:26, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.