Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zara Taylor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 09:24, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zara Taylor[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of an actress and musician, with no reliably sourced claim to passing either WP:NACTOR or WP:NMUSIC. Her apparent notability claim as a musician is a song that charted on Beatport, but that's a single-vendor WP:BADCHART that does not pass NMUSIC #2 (which requires national charts on the order of Billboard) -- and as an actress her only notability claim is supporting and bit parts, which is also not an automatic notability freebie in the absence of reliably sourced evidence of the significance of at least some of her performances, such as notable acting awards and/or the reception of media coverage about her. But this is referenced entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability at all, and even on a ProQuest search for older sourcing that might not have Googled all I get is nine glancing namechecks of her existence in event calendar listings and other sources that aren't about her. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to pass GNG on the sourcing. Bearcat (talk) 03:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:29, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:29, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Another case of WP:TOOSOON. I couldn't find a single reliable secondary source to help her qualify for WP:GNG. Missvain (talk) 20:47, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously deleted via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:41, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't pass GNG or any SNG. Mlb96 (talk) 09:16, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.