Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zanker Recycling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zanker Recycling[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional, undisclosed paid editing of non notable company. Theroadislong (talk) 17:25, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and for failing WP:COMPANY notability guidelines. Ifnord (talk) 17:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing significant found by way of non-insider WP:RS on Google. Nothing in News, Books or recent search results. Dare I suggest that, rather than deletion, the letters and words used within this article are carefully disassembled and recycled into new content that actually meets WP:NCORP? Nick Moyes (talk) 22:50, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:04, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:04, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:04, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:NOTPROMO. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.