Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zak Spears

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy (talk) 08:15, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zak Spears[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Zak Spears (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources can be found to substantiate nor prove article’s subject is notable hence fails WP:GNG. Indeed the lack of sources in this case is more than obvious. AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 13:17, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Thebiv19 (talk) 14:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Thebiv19 (talk) 14:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:17, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:27, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:28, 27 April 2020 (UTC) [reply]
@Bearian: I don't think that being into such a list makes you notable, there are thousands of lists like that which basically are the author's favorite porn actor (infact there is not a page for each of them on wikipedia). Never the less you should add it to the article because at the moment there is hardly anything at all in the sourcing.--AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 09:37, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Bearian and the awards the subject has won. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 21:35, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Godsy: you know that since we have deprecated pornbio those prizes don't count anything anymore, don't you? --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 22:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The deprecation of pornbio means that the consideration of such awards is no longer codified, but not that they are completely irrelevant. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 22:18, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Godsy: well, we decided that they do not prove any notability anymore. anyway, do we have any source that he actually won those prizes at least? --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 00:24, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@AlejandroLeloirRey:Wait, my understanding is that it was decided that awards do not prove any _additional_ notability; per current WP:N there is nothing saying that porn performers are punished compared to the other performers - therefore, usual WP:GNG / WP:BIO / WP:ENT should apply (and satisfying ANY of them is good enough to establish notability). Now, if there is a (non-porn) actor with a dozen awards in their field, would we consider these awards for notability? I think yes, and then, based on the logic above, we should consider these awards when speaking about notability of a porn performer. Ipsign (talk) 15:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above, likely interviews and articles exist but many publications of his time would be off-line. Gleeanon409 (talk) 08:50, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per both WP:GNG (multiple awards do indicate multiple sources), and per WP:ENT ("has made... prolific... contributions"). Ipsign (talk) 15:41, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Gleeanon409: "likely interviews and articles exist" is not an argument here @Ipsign: as far as I know, awards and being prolific since pornbio has been deprecated do not count toward notability anymore, which is the only important thing when we decide to keep a bio. --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 16:53, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Zak_Spears&oldid=958402522"