Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zak Sobel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wifione _.......^{Leave a message} 06:46, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zak Sobel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking GHIts and GNEWS of substance. The article makes a number of unsubstantiated claims. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC. ttonyb (talk) 04:48, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A Google search just yields the usual Facebook and YouTube hits that would be expected for a young performer starting out. No evidence of notability by our standards, and the article doesn't include anything that establishes notability either. Cullen328 (talk) 06:41, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 06:50, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not appear to have reachedn sufficient recognition to meet WP:BAND.--Kudpung (talk) 07:00, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I saw Zak sobel last week at a performance. And searched for more info online. I was glad to find this page. I dont know what exactly deletion means but this was helpful as I want to write an article on him for the local paper. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.123.254 (talk) 23:16, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.