Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zahida Zarik Khan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zahida Zarik Khan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable politician who fails to satisfy any criterion from WP:NPOL. Being a “youth chief” of a political party in no way confers notability. A before search shows WP:GNG isn’t satisfied either. Celestina007 (talk) 05:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 05:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 05:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 05:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 05:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Amazing woman that I hope continues to press forward. In a unique position to infect young minds with dreams of great accomplishments and has the position to help them succeed in achieving said dreams. Unfortunately, a BEFORE search doesn't turn up much more than what is provided and it's not enough to pass GNG criteria. --ARoseWolf (Talk) 20:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As above, the material is not enough to pass GNG criteria. The lady is certainly an example to others. WP:POLOUTCOMES indicates that there are substantial requirements for the inclusion of politicians and elected officials. Not met here. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:47, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.