Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zack Page

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. If an editor want to work on this article in Draft space, let me or WP:REFUND know. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:21, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zack Page[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BEFORE search found no significant coverage, only passing mentions of being somebody's opponent. Fails WP:GNG. – ².O.^Boxing 08:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. ².O.^Boxing 08:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and United States of America. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:05, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:04, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As a professional he won 21 of 68 fights. He was 1-1 as an amateur losing in the round of 32 at the PAL championships (not sure why the article says he was "featured"). Clearly fails to meet WP:NBOX and nothing I found makes me believe that WP:GNG is met. Fight results and databases do not show WP notability and he doesn't get WP notability for his loss to Fury. Papaursa (talk) 00:32, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails NBOX. You're not notable solely based on your opponents. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 00:52, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

HES A STILL A PROFESSIONAL BOXER, WE STILL GIVE WIKIPEDIA PAGES TO UNKNOWN BOXERS, YET THEY ARE STILL UP, WHY IS THIS PAGE BEING DELETED! THERE IS NO REASON, HE WAS A RESPECTED PROFESSIONAL BOXER. YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT ANY OF THIS. GET A LIFE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.100.184.38 (talk) 02:18, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"capslock"

Please be careful the way how you act. Kaseng55 (talk) 03:01, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@174.100.184.38 sources? also see WP:SHOUTING InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 03:45, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please reconsider deletion of this page. the proper information has been added, Zack Page is professional fighter, who has fought against some of boxings toughest opponents. he is a well known respected fighter in the community, and yes. His record does not prove any significance, however the outcome of his fights do. not many fighters can go toe to toe all 6 or 8 or 10 rounds with some of the best heavyweights in the world. so I ask that you please review, reconsider and do not delete this page. it took me a few days to gather up all the information regarding Zack Page so that I could organize this page. There are less significant fighters, that are linked on his fighting record, who all have pages, and has fought nobody significant either. for that I see this is a little bias and unfair. So all I ask is that you reconsider your choice and avoid the deletion of this page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Porfiriotorres991 (talk • contribs) 15:46, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Coverage I could find is limited to routine match recaps/previews, not SIGCOV. Doesn't pass GNG. JoelleJay (talk) 00:08, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.