Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zachary Throne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:49, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zachary Throne[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on an actor who, while he has had a number of appearances on TV shows and films, doesn't assert his notability. No hits on gnews, and the first three pages of Google results don't return any notable articles or secondary source coverage on him. Speedy declined. Mr. Vernon (talk) 01:38, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:41, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. A Gold record should mean something. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:12, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 04:31, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 22:21, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As article looks to have been written from a fan's perspective, it will definitely benefit from major cleanup, but such is do-able (though I will not be able to do so myself for some 36 hours). His long and verifiable filmography appears to nicely meet the intent and spirit of WP:ENT,[1] he appears to have just enough more-than-trivial coverage to meet WP:GNG, and his 1992 Gold record pings at WP:ANYBIO. It just needs regular editing. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.