Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zachary Neil Tarnopol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 09:30, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zachary Neil Tarnopol[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. No convincing claim to notability. Sources are mere listings or social media. Nothing significant or RS. DanielRigal (talk) 08:16, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:58, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:58, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Also, it appears the author is possibly engaged in COI or UPE page creations. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I am independant author. I write about anything and everything. I do not discriminate or write anything in favour of anyone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CanadianBBQ (talk • contribs) 03:47, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No reliably sourced evidence of notability. This appears to be an attempt to create an autobiography on Wikipedia. The same editor added the name to List of YouTubers. Sundayclose (talk) 15:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Comment: Like it or not, I added Zachary Neil Tarnopol to the list of YouTubers because he is obviously an established content creator. Don't you think a YouTuber who's having a Verified YouTube channel with over 1.1 Billion views and 4.6 million followers deserves to be notable.?? People put up pages for personalities who come from 1/10 the number of subscribers Zachary Tarnopol has on YouTube and they are deemed notable. If you wanna talk about numbers, 4,600,000 that is how many people who follow Poke. I don't think that is a small number to be ignored. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CanadianBBQ (talk • contribs) 03:47, 22 October 2020 (UTC) CanadianBBQ has already voted, striking duplicate "keep" vote. theinstantmatrix (talk) 11:57, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - zero evidence of notability; appears to be a blatant attempt to promote the subject Spiderone 16:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Comment: Poke has won YouTube creator awards. Obviously I don't think it needs much of explanation. A channel gets Silver button Creator award upon having 100,00 Subscribers and Golden Play Button creator award on reaching 1,000,000 Subscribers. Poke has 4.6 Million followers making him one of the biggest YouTube content creators. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CanadianBBQ (talk • contribs) 03:47, 22 October 2020 (UTC) CanadianBBQ has already voted, striking duplicate "keep" vote. theinstantmatrix (talk) 11:57, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers of subscribers and followers are irrelevant in a notability discussion. Please provide reliable sources showing significant coverage Spiderone 23:17, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A simple and straightforward google search of his online handle yields exactly 5 results. Haleth (talk) 13:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Comment: Not trying to be harsh but mate, you really need to do better with searches. Zachary Neil Tarnopol, Zachary Tarnopol, Poke, Pokediger1 are the names the subject goes by. Some artists deserve respect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CanadianBBQ (talk • contribs) 03:47, 22 October 2020 (UTC) CanadianBBQ has already voted, striking duplicate "keep" vote. theinstantmatrix (talk) 11:57, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Barely found anything about him. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Comment: Yet again, there are films to which he contributed to which other costars are also notable figures. Nearly 5 Million people subscribe to Poke's YouTube channel and even a single search would give you plenty of results. His song became a huge hit with over 18,430,000 (18.4 Million Viral Video Views) and still you say he isn't notable? That's more x times the average hits any pop singer in the 21st century is receiving. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CanadianBBQ (talk • contribs) 03:47, 22 October 2020 (UTC) CanadianBBQ has already voted, striking duplicate "keep" vote. theinstantmatrix (talk) 11:57, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The creator of the article, CanadianBBQ, is indeffed for undisclosed paid editing. Sundayclose (talk) 00:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If I was paying somebody to write an article about me I think I would try to find somebody who could link the channel they are trying to promote correctly. ;-) I've fixed it in the article now, if anybody cares. I don't think that it helps the case for the article at all except to the trivial extent that it proves that the channel exists and isn't a complete hoax. --DanielRigal (talk) 13:06, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.