Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zac German

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 01:46, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zac German[edit]

A friend of mine wrote this article, and this in a kid at my school. There's no need for such an article, and I propose it be deleted, mainly due to the fact that it is completely false. Hurricanehink 19:01, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is completely true and is intended to inform others of Zac German's fame. While not well known to the general public, German was still incredibly influencial in many groups across the world.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.150.185.239 (talk • contribs)

I agree wholeheartedly with the above. This article is completely true. I know both Zac and the man who wrote it. Believe me, if you know Zac at all, you'll realize that this article is pure truthiness. All those who don't agree are simply jealous. -Hurricanebrantley,lawlz/roflcopters 141.150.185.226 18:07, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How can you say it's true? There's no sources, and I know the kid who wrote it! Hurricanehink 19:11, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Of course you know who wrote it, what does that have to do with the validity of the article? For instance you write many articles yourself. German is not well published and news is mainly transferred through word of mouth.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.150.185.239 (talk • contribs)

Note The above IP address belongs to the Ocean City, NJ Public School System. Fan1967 19:38, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, hoax or attack page. Sandstein 19:16, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete not notable; probably patent nonsense. Bucketsofg 19:17, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy if the author/subject really thinks the article is worth keeping. Delete as absolute bollocks otherwise. --Bugwit grunt / scribbles 19:28, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Yea, I let him know. Hurricanehink 19:30, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as hoax, patent nonsense, and bollocks Fan1967 19:38, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as schoolboy hoax. What little information that could be verified is patently false (he clearly wasn't the manager of Blur). Gwernol 19:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom and above. --light darkness^(talk) 20:00, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious delete. I am surprised that nobody saw fit to remove his telephone number from the article until I did it. User:Zoe|^(talk) 21:01, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete {{hoax}} article. (aeropagitica) 22:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are obvious verifiability problems with this. Capitalistroadster 23:51, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:26, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.