Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZSP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ZSP[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. Only the two refs from EETimes seem non-primary (design-reuse.com doesn't seem very reliable - "Suppliers, list your IPs for free." - seems like they would reprint anything either for free or for a fee, no indication of editorial control). For the EETimes article, one focuses on a "fledgling DSP design house ZSP Corp.", and the remaining one seems "busienss as usual" - "Chinese ASIC design house acquires LSI Logic's DSP unit", and doesn't seem sufficient to establish notability for the topic. At best, a summary of the referenced parts of the article could be merged to VeriSilicon. On that note, there is also the clear WP:COI/WP:CORPSPAM issue to consider - this was created by WP:SPA User:VeriSilicon... PS. If this is deleted, please restore as the original redirect. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:17, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:42, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:42, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or merge into VeriSilicon. Everything except the history section is just describing the products in promotional terms. Alas, the parent company article is in even worse shape, written in marketing-speak. I am in a related industry, but have no idea what the heck SiPaaS means. Nothing to do with "platforms" nor "solutions" for sure. The parent company (up for proposed delete) might be notable, but maybe not worth saving the current article since one would need to start from scratch anyway. W Nowicki (talk) 17:39, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947 07:55, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. (actually restore to original version). Not notable. Proposed merge target has been deleted. Comment: all substantive edits on this page were made by editor LeviLiu (talk · contribs) who appears to be WP:SPA. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:50, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.