Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZEV 10 LRC (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 23:37, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ZEV 10 LRC[edit]

ZEV 10 LRC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't really appear to be notable enough. The entire page is written like an advertisement and only uses primary sources from the company itself. Page is also a stub, and I doubt enough information can be found on this or even Z Electric Vehicle to do it. - Skynorth/Cosmohey 23:08, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:47, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:47, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete- yes, this is clearly an advertisement. Nothing much in the way of independent sources. Reyk YO! 08:12, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 19:00, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Z Electric Vehicle. Present article reads like an advertisement and is probably by a CoI creator. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:05, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Reads like an advertisement. I don't think it's worth making the article a redirect, since "ZEV 10 LRC" looks too obscure for people to be typing into Wikipedia search. – numbermaniac 13:18, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, This is an advertisment Alex-h (talk) 14:37, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.