Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yvette Rosser (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 01:40, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yvette Rosser[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG. ∯WBG^converse 15:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ∯WBG^converse 15:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. ∯WBG^converse 15:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. ∯WBG^converse 15:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. ∯WBG^converse 15:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. ∯WBG^converse 15:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ∯WBG^converse 15:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. ∯WBG^converse 15:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ∯WBG^converse 15:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable author with multiple and heavily cited works. Rioter 1 (talk) 12:05, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
WP:AADD. Given your last few edits, you have a 98.23% chance of being topic-banned. ∯WBG^converse 12:30, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- Satisfied that she isn't notable author, Fail Passes WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG --MA Javadi (talk) 16:28, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't pass WP:GNG, [WP:NACADEMIC]] or WP:NAUTHOR. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:48, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete searches fail to produce adequate sources. Fails WP:NACADEMIC, WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR.E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:12, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.