Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yung Swiss

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:40, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yung Swiss[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Basically most part of this article isn't properly sourced. Results bring up press releases about his EPs or songs and nothing more, thus failing WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:37, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:37, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:37, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per reliable sources found discussing Yung Swiss including The Times, North Eastern Tribune, Independent Online etc. The article might need additional sources, but that doesn't mean the subject isn't notable. Stanleytux (talk) 07:10, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:40, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The sources provided by Stanleytux do seem to indicate passing WP:GNG. --Oakshade (talk) 20:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.