Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuan Wang
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was KEEP. -Splash - tk 20:22, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yuan Wang[edit]
- Yuan Wang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's possible that this paleontologist is notable -- but certainly nothing in the article states that. The only reference is to a meeting with a visiting scientist! Delete unless notability further established. --Nlu (talk) 15:31, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Full pass of WP:Prof#C1 with GS h-index of 31 and 8 papers with +100 cites. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC).[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 22:13, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Museum director gives a plausible case for notability and Xxanthippe's findings indicate a clear pass of WP:PROF. I'm not particularly concerned about the quality of the current sources of the article, for one thing because they're not used to source very much and for another because I would expect that the main reason we haven't turned up better ones is the language barrier rather than their nonexistence. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:04, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.