Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yua Aida

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep; withdrawn. MCB 06:48, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yua Aida[edit]

*Delete per WP:PORNBIO - CrazyRussian talk/email 13:08, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn - CrazyRussian talk/email 16:00, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per 1.5million Ghits, 66 DVDs and 14 books on sale at amazon.co.jp, inclusion in Japanese wikipedia, along with several other recent similar discussions regarding the appropriateness of PORNBIO for some of these articles. Neier 13:38, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Neier 13:40, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but is in desperate need of references/external links. The JPS ^{talk to me} 13:47, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Neier. WP:PORN BIO is (unsurprisingly) woefully biased towards the American porn industry, as I'm sure you can tell just by looking at many of its criteria. ja:あいだゆあ lists about 70 videos and other publications, which actually puts her close to the massively disproportionate requirement of 100 in PORNBIO (which would be typically many times harder to meet for Japanese AV actresses due to the fact that most Japanese DVD releases are a single girl with many scenes, instead of many girls with just one or two scenes each as in the US). --Rankler 15:02, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Regardless of any perceived bias in WP:BIO or the proposed WP:PORN BIO, actress does not seem to be verifiably notable. - Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 15:27, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Rankler, verifiable popular performer. Kappa 15:55, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (though Deletion nomination has apparently withdrawn for now) - per Neier and Rankler. Clearly notable, though the article itself does need expanding and sourcing. I'll try to do some work on it later. Dekkappai 17:22, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, it's clear enough from the Japanese Wikipedia entry that this would pass a hypothetical Japanese-oriented equivalent of the WP:PORN BIO proposal. — Haeleth Talk 19:52, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.