Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yroo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:54, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yroo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine funding notices and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/Tentboy12 with no other contributions outside this topic. Does not meet WP:NCORP. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:23, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:17, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:18, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:03, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is sourced from independent media, I am not sure if that's enough if someone just contributed once because Wikipedia is available to public and no one is bound to edit again and again, I think it's wrong if we base our deletions on this scenario, I may be wrong please guide. I read in terms and services and policies that Wikipedia is a result of contributions from ordinary people like us. This is being used in 35 countries (as per the claim and references), so I think not bad in keeping. I also found these 2 references from The Entrepreneur 1|https://www.entrepreneur.com/video/284675 and Fortune 2|http://fortune.com/2016/08/11/term-sheet-thursday-august-11/ The Mirror and A magazine, I am now updating the article. Thank you Mia Watson (talk) 17:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete I think this article from the Irish Times is a significant writeup, but its the only one I've been able to find, and its from 2016. The rest of the sources look like churnalism, because the WP:NORG standards are so high — another option would be to userfy without prejudice to recreation, in case more sources become available in the future. It's not so promotional as to be unsalvageable, but I'm not seeing enough in-depth coverage right now. Seraphim System ^(talk) 12:58, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteNo usable sources for notability The Irish Times article is essentially a press release from the company and theIrish Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, , whose position has the purpose of promoting companies in Ireland--even one that does so little as establish a branch office with 33 people. The Fortune reference is a mere mention of an investment in a list of recent investments. The Entrepreneur item is a shopping recommendation. DGG ( talk ) 13:24, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.