Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youth Institute of Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. A7 by Anachronist. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:57, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Youth Institute of Technology[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines and lacks non-trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Steps were taken to locate sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful.

I believe this is blatant advertisement . A similar AfDs Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youth Group of Schools and Colleges and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youth Academy Saqib (talk) 09:08, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 09:51, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 09:51, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It's, again, heavily a duplicate argument from Youth academy, but putting aside merely insane advertising - I'm unsure whether this institute actually exists. In any case, while I heavily lean towards accredited senior academic facilities being near-automatically notable there doesn't seem any significant NON-OR source covering this at all. I can't determine any state of accreditation. Even a proper business magazine etc bit might have been good enough, but there's nothing here that could do it. Whatever graduation of WP:GNG, WP:NSCHOOL or even WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES there doesn't seem to be anyway this article (and its compatriots) can remain.

If anyone has better luck in their WP:BEFORE check then of course post - the naming makes it tricky to find anything, though no non-OR source comes up with all of it. There are lots of sources that bring up the organisation or its founder, but they are all either OR, social media, or anything anyone can post about themselves. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:51, 17 May 2018 (UTC) Nosebagbear (talk) 10:56, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Is this a school or a tutoring organization? It says it is affiliated with certain secondary schools. It sounds more like a vocational school and not a traditional academic school so it would have to meet WP:ORGCRIT instead of WP:NSCHOOL. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:16, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the associated secondary schools verbiage. It is not mentioned at all on the websites provided. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:32, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:19, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:19, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That section was a copy-paste of their statement on the main website. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:39, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete CSD A7 unremarkable company / organization. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:41, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Creator UA85 has gotten in trouble before for creating articles and removing CSD posts [1] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:49, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.