Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Your Mommy Kills Animals (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator Courcelles (talk) 01:13, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Mommy Kills Animals (film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable indie film; only references provided are transcripts of lawsuits (!). User who created this article, Fourdee, has been banned permanently by Jimbo Wales himself. Stonemason89 (talk) 16:36, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 04:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep while the creator was banned for some serious issues, and the current article is badly done, the film itself does appear to be notable, with coverage found in various books[1] and in the news. Weak keep primarily because of the bad start it got by an editor banned for his constant attack speech, and the obvious non-neutral nature of the existing article, but alas, AfD is not the place to deal with the clean it up it needs. Someone also posted some review links on the article's talk page. Together, it meets WP:NF and WP:N. -- AnmaFinotera (talk ~ contribs) 04:33, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and send to WP:Cleanup per User:AnmaFinotera's insightful comments. JiImbo may have banned the author[2], but as has been noted, we are discussing an improvable article and not a banned editor. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:32, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comment A slightly different Find sources search reveals dozens of articles dealing with this film.[3] Cleanup, improvement, and sourcing have begun. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:56, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw Looks like this subject is notable after all. Since the article is now undergoing cleanup, I've decided to withdraw my nomination. Stonemason89 (talk) 01:02, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.