Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Younique Unit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 05:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Younique Unit[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a temporary S.M. Entertainment unit group that does not appear to have any notability. Random86 (talk) 02:31, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - Younique Unit does have quite a bit of YouTube views for "Maxstep", and has been noted on various news sites. Nonetheless, it's only a temporary unit group but more editors need to vote and decide on this (which is why my position of Delete is weak at this time). Tibbydibby (talk) 01:28, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:16, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – If necessary, add a sentence to each of their articles to say they were a member this group too. – Margin1522 (talk) 22:25, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yet another SM Entertainment one-off project group with no notability other than being part of SM Entertainment. Youtube views are easily manipulated and not an indication of notability unless they are exceptional. Song did not chart anywhere or was not released. All temporary members have their own pages, so (as already mentioned), just add a sentence to those articles. Plus, the EP it was on already has an article (though it had poor chart performance) that can cover all relevant information. Shinyang-i (talk) 03:22, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. non-notable temporary unit group SmileBlueJay97 talk 01:41, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.