Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YouTwoTV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There is no consensus to delate this article. The nomination itself was effectively annulled by User:Lourdes' presentation of sources, and the plagarism concerns, whilst understandably concerning have now been dealt with, per WP:RUBBISH @arguments to avoid, and "resolved as quickly as possible." (non-admin closure) >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 18:10, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

YouTwoTV[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. -- HindWiki^Connect 00:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- HindWiki^Connect 00:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:GNG.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Lourdes 07:27, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe (talk) 01:09, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are a plagiarism concerns with this article, as shown here. More than a few pieces of the text are insufficiently paraphrased, borrowing the structure and phrasing from the source material.Spintendo ᔦᔭ 09:45, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. J 947 ^{^{^{(c · m)}}} 03:13, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. J 947 ^{^{^{(c · m)}}} 03:13, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've now removed/changed all the lines that were close paraphrasing. Lourdes 10:55, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.