Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yotam Solomon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) czar · · 17:24, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yotam Solomon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pure promotion,: article mostly devoted to name-dropping, references all either mentions or PR If I'm wrong, I'll withdraw the AfD. . DGG ( talk ) 03:12, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 05:37, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 05:37, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep VERY messy article, full of WP:PEACOCK, but I think he easily passes WP:GNG. Receiving coverage in Vogue UK and US is pretty notable for a fashion designer, plus I see quite a number of articles on him, interviews, etc. I'm going to guess the article was created following his appearance on America's Next Top Model. For someone who mainly works on made-to-order and custom orders, he's received quite a lot of coverage considering this - many such designers work under the radar. The article should be rewritten/cropped down to cut a lot of the waffle and promo, but I think he's notable and will have to have a more in-depth search when I've a bit more time as he sounds REALLY interesting! Mabalu (talk) 09:54, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This Vogue UK article is devoted to him, and describes him as a "Former violin prodigy in Austria, Fashion Institute of Design and Merchandising whiz kid in Los Angeles, and designer extraordinaire". This Haaeretz article is devoted to him, as is this article. None of those are mere "mentions", and all three are to RSs. And there are a number of other such articles that appear in searches in both English and Hebrew. Meets GNG.Epeefleche (talk) 15:35, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:19, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I also found this article. -- Whpq (talk) 17:22, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.