Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yogananth Andiappan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yogananth Andiappan[edit]

Yogananth Andiappan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article in its current form appears to not to pass WP:BASIC. Analyzing the references

  • this is about membership of a golf club
  • this is an indication that Mr Andiappan is a member of the International Association of Yoga Therapists. Please do note that just the fact that it does not have a Wikipedia article does not mean it is not a reputable professional organization.
  • This BBC News reference indicates that Mr Andiappan has a yoga practice in Hong Kong.
  • this is a page on the andiappanyoga.com website. While it may assist in locating Mr Andiappan within a family of yogis, it is not a reliable third-party source about the subject of the article.
  • this indicates that Mr Andiappan has had an article published in Asana Journal.

Any number of non-notable people have written books, have written articles in scholarly journals, are yogis, and so on. Did I get this wrong? As always, please do prove me wrong about this. --Shirt58 (talk) 12:13, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:26, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:26, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:26, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:54, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Non-notable for reasons given by nom. JMHamo (talk) 15:08, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Not a notable yogi. I was on the fence before because it made it seem he was bringing yoga to Hong Kong, but that is not the case. There are many yogi's who are also not of note, who have published in small publications. Allaboutjane8181 (talk) 02:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as there's nothing at all convincing for solid independent notability, current information and sources are not at all convincing. SwisterTwister talk 07:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.