Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoann Henri Le Teuff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seresin ( ¡? ) 08:34, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yoann Henri Le Teuff[edit]

No assertion of notability, and thus non-notable. His teaching at Matthew Boulton comes from a personal page of his, while his CV here indicates no research after the awarding of the PhD. The rm of speedy claimed hits on Google Scholar - there were none. "Y.H. Le Teuff" gets more hits but the majority of them are not for the PhD work as claimed, but rather a database for which he was not the sole contributor. Therefore, I do not see credible support for the statements in the article that would establish scientific notability. MSJapan (talk) 15:25, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:50, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A relatively recent PhD (2000) with only a few publications, per his CV. GoogleSearch does show one highly cited paper (97 citations), joint with two other people but after that citations quickly drop to 13 and then to a few single digits[1]. Not enough here to satisfy WP:PROF yet. May become notable soon but not at the moment. Nsk92 (talk) 18:20, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
weak delete the highest number of hits for an actual research article according to NASA ADS, is 27. However, judging from the full CV at [2], might possibly be notable as a secondary school teacher--the subjects 2nd career. .DGG (talk) 04:42, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete per DGG & NsK92, does not meet the criteria of WP:PROF. Pete.Hurd (talk) 18:40, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree, where as he may of been the sole contributer in the UMIST database, his phd did regardless feature in journals of science and researches have used his work on Wolf Rayet stars to advancement of knowledge, his notability is proven there fore it does not warrent a delete —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.236.146.87 (talk) 20:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.