Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yellowberry Creek
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:50, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Yellowberry Creek[edit]
- Yellowberry Creek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced. Unable to find reliable sources upon a quick search. "Stream" whose significance has not been established. Fails notability guideline. RoCo(talk) 20:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: I can't seem to find much of anything about this creek. This article has no claim of notability. bojo | talk 23:45, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Nothing notable can be said for this geographic feature. It exists but that's about it.Glendoremus (talk) 18:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment, it is a real, named feature. Reserving my judgement until I can think a bit more on this one. Lankiveil (speak to me) 02:19, 29 March 2017 (UTC).
- Delete - can't find reliable sources.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:14, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.