Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yeiner Perez
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Holy smokes, Batman--that's a clear-cut case of speedy delete and close per SNOW and BLP1E. Trout for whoever wrote this. Drmies (talk) 02:00, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeiner Perez[edit]
- Yeiner Perez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. See WP:BLP1E and WP:BLPCRIME. Randykitty (talk) 21:42, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per ONEEVENT NintendoFan (Talk, Contribs) 22:26, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A one-event biography that fails WP:CRIME. No evidence of notability as an entertainer. The guidance "Editors must give serious consideration to not creating an article on an alleged perpetrator when no conviction is yet secured." applies here. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for all the reasons stated by others, plus a compassionate reading of WP:BLP. This young man suffered a humiliating public psychiatric crisis. He should be spared a permanent record of it in the world's leading encyclopedia. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 00:38, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete, speedy if possible. A single unflattering event does not make for notability. While there are sources from reputable outlets, this still shouldn't be here. Hairhorn (talk) 00:09, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.