Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yea Big + Kid Static
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. I am closing this discussion early because this group meets notability requirements more than sufficiently. If you do a bit of research, you'll find plenty of high-end sources validating their importance. See links posted by Michig. JamieS93 08:21, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yea Big + Kid Static[edit]
- Yea Big + Kid Static (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable group Koala15 (talk) 04:44, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 May 24. Snotbot t • c » 05:33, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 05:46, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 05:47, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep due to failure to follow WP:BEFORE and typically lacking deletion rationale. The article already links to these: [1],[2],[3], and even a cursory search (e.g. a quick search in Google and the first page of the Google News archive) would find these: XLR8R, Allmusic, Allmusic, Riverfront Times, Chicago Sun Times, TimeOut Chicago, PopMatters, PopMatters, PopMatters, Chicago Tribune, Chicago Tribune, Chicago Tribune. There's more out there on GNews and GBooks. --Michig (talk) 06:42, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep per the above. Nom's rationale is contradicted by the sources already present in the article and the many more that exist elsewhere online. Gong show 18:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.