Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yattee
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:18, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Yattee[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Yattee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Similar to Invidious but with less referencing support. This article seems to be for promotion and only has primary sources; the only non-primary reference does not mention the subject. Indefensible (talk) 00:46, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - I cannot find any in-depth coverage in independent sources, even unreliable ones. No evidence of genuine notability. —Ganesha811 (talk) 15:37, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.