Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yasmina Siadatan (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus--Ymblanter (talk) 10:32, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yasmina Siadatan[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Yasmina Siadatan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Most content has been removed on the basis it is contentious
This article has had most content removed by another editor who considers the content contentious and the references inadequate. The remainder content is little more than a promotional item for the subject's restaurant. I therefore consider the article should be deleted.Tomintoul (talk) 20:29, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 July 9. Snotbot t • c » 20:50, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:44, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:44, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:44, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: An edit war does not justify an AfD, and this should be resolved elsewhere. BTW, the previous AfD was a unanimous "keep". --Technopat (talk) 11:26, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I've no wish to engage with the editor who removed most of the content and made aggressive comments/used bad language. Current version of article is merely a few words basically promoting a restaurant – I suspect few will want to keep it.Tomintoul (talk) 12:27, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There was little doubt expressed about her notability in 2009 at the previous AfD and she continues to receive coverage whether in Hello Magazine or The Independent. Much of what is written about her elsewhere is trivia or concentrates on her personal life, neither of which has much place in WP, but since she was described as a restaurateur on entering the competition her connections with a named restaurant are clearly relevant to notability, as is the brief description of her participation in The Apprentice and subsequent career. --AJHingston (talk) 09:46, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: There were only three comments in total on the previous debate.Tomintoul (talk) 10:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per AJHinhston that there is sufficient notability. I would also posit that the article fulfills WP:GNG too thus shouldn't be deleted. It appears to me that the nominator created this AFD because he was in an edit war and didn't want to talk to the other person. That is not what AFD is for. I would suggest that this AFD be closed and the nominator takes it to WP:DR. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 11:31, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I have little interest in the article and certainly don't want to engage the other editor in debate. Unless somebody else picks up the baton or challenges the other editor, what is left is barely a stub, let alone an article.Tomintoul (talk) 10:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 00:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Passes WP:BASIC. Source examples: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5](subscription required), [6]. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:19, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge back to an article on the series. I see nothing notable in her bio, except her appearance in a show, which is best dealt with in an article on the show, not a separate one on the winner. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:55, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to List of The Apprentice candidates (UK). Gamaliel (talk) 18:18, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Subject meets WP:GNG. There are plenty of other articles not directly relating to her winning The Apprentice or quitting her job at Alan Sugar's company Amscreen Healthcare; [7][8][9][10][11]. Also if there are problems with the article then this can be addressed through normal editing not deletion, WP:SOFIXIT. Tanbircdq (talk) 00:59, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Hidden category: