Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yash A Patnaik

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 02:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yash A Patnaik[edit]

Yash A Patnaik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionably notable and improvable as the best I found was this, this, this and this but none of it is convincingly better. Pinging past users Kolbasz and Vanjagenije, subject users Onel5969, Human3015, SpacemanSpiff, AusLondonder, Yash! (why not? I also have to say this is the first time I've encountered a "Yash" article at AfD ), MichaelQSchmidt, [email protected] and also DGG who may want to comment. SwisterTwister talk 07:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Youi found sources suiable for WP:V. Why not choose add them rather than delete?? WP:NOTCLEANUP. Schmidt, Michael Q. 09:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Alts per WP:INDAFD: "Yash A Patnaik" "Yash Patnaik"
  • Keep per meeting WP:GNG and thus WP:BASIC. Needs better sourcing yes, but since such are available and the article improvable, we have no valid reason to delete. Thanks. Schmidt, Michael Q. 09:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - SwisterTwister, unlike me, this Yash seems notable. I have added the source for the awards that his film won in 2010. Having produced this many popular shows and Google showing okayish results, this passes WP:GNG. Yash! 10:10, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: As per Yash, seems notable film producer. Produced multiple shows, that too popular.--Human3015TALK  12:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Agree with others above. Enough sourcing found to meet WP:GNG AusLondonder (talk) 14:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.