Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yapool

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ultraman Ace. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 22:44, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yapool[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a large plot summary that lacks any references. TTN (talk) 21:31, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the series article (Ultraman Ace), where the "List of characters/monsters..." was rd'd to as well. Ansh6 6 6 01:34, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Ultraman Ace. Article fails to indicate any notability and Google is not any help turning up references. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:16, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect—works for me, but take a look at Template:Ultra Monsters. There's a cartload of similar articles that are all either unsourced, or sourced to primary materials (like photographs and such), making the articles WP:OR. Has anyone ever AfD'd 100 articles at a time before? WP has always had a horrible time dealing with situations like this. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 14:26, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- To be honest, if someone wants to go through that they can probably all just be redirected. Ansh6 6 6 16:22, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.