Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yannick Nomede

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 03:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yannick Nomede[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article scrapes past WP:NFOOTBALL by skin of its teeth, but WP:GNG is failed massively in my opinion, I can't find anything about him apart from a few footballer profiles. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:29, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one (or two) appearances is insufficient when GNG was failed comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 22:15, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A check of WP:BEFORE gave me no results for this plaayer so fails WP:GNG on that front. HawkAussie (talk) 22:54, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - it looks like he played 18 mins in Ligue 1 and 6 mins in Ligue 2 but has no other recorded appearances at professional level. Nomède is now 37 years old and has been languishing in the 6th tier of France and below for more than a decade. Since there is no coverage that would satisfy WP:GNG either, I see no reason to keep the article. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.