Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yanks in the U.K.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Bones episodes. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 23:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yanks in the U.K.[edit]

Other Bones episodes lack their own article and I fail to see why this is an exception. This article also is quite poor, lacking information on the UK recepetion of the article (As commented on in the talk page) Computerjoe 's talk 22:35, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Also, what's wrong with the list of episodes, found here? ~Pip 2 andahalf 04:25, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why should this episode outline be deleted? It's not try that other Bones episodes lack their own page - many others have some. If you are concerned about the UK reception, why don't you find it out and add it?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephanya88 (talk • contribs) 03:05, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What makes this episode notable? Computerjoe 's talk 20:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Bones episodes, and per WP:EPISODE#Dealing with problem articles, please avoid bringing articles on episodes of well-known shows to AfD. There is some reliable source coverage in the New Zealand Herald, but perhaps this is not enough to satisfy notability. DHowell (talk) 01:12, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect meaning delete and redirect so it can't be recreated. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:13, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- How does "delete and redirect" prevent recreation? An AFD consensus to redirect (without deletion) would have the same "force" against recreation as an AFD consensus to delete. All deletion does is deny editors access to material which might be able to be used in another article (and the news article I linked to showed that at least some of the information is verifiable, even if it might not be notable). DHowell (talk) 04:05, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.