Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yalgaar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. czar 22:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yalgaar[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Repeatedly recreated without proper sourcing. None of the other language versions have better sourcing. Lack of in depth coverage in reliable independent sources. There may be sources in Hindi or other languages can’t access, in which case I’m happy to withdraw this. Mccapra (talk) 22:11, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Mccapra (talk) 22:11, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Added a few things (for example there are 2 pages in a book about Sanjay Dutt covering the production, negative but still). Opposed to deletion. Could be redirected to Feroz Khan (actor)#Filmography but I think it's best to have a standalone page.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 02:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

those are interesting tidbits of information but they are not in depth coverage of the subject. Mccapra (talk) 04:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - easily notable, one of the highest-grossing films of that year. Sources are available. Needs expansion, not deletion. It is challenging to find sources for Indian films of that period as no archives exist, but it's good as is. Shahid • ^Talk2me 10:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source by The Indian Express has been added. Shahid • ^Talk2me 10:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:28, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. The sources currently in the article are marginal and better ones are not easily available on line but what we have is much better than nothing and strongly suggests that more reviews in contemporary (1992) offline sources should exist. Eluchil404 (talk) 00:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 21:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - a high grossing film with notable actors Mr Vili talk 00:51, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.