Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yak Shaving Day
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 01:34, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yak Shaving Day[edit]
- Yak Shaving Day (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Why was this undeleted? No sources anywhere; only source given was a non-notable dictionary and a link from Wiktionary. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:59, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:N. Endofskull (talk) 03:12, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete due to lack of independent, reliable sources needed to estalish notability. Cullen328 (talk) 04:10, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Surprise, surprise, article from 2004 when someone was watching a rerun of "Ren and Stimpy" late one night. As far as I know, this early 90s Nickelodeon show, as with "Doug", hasn't been seen in years and years. Still, not notable then, not notable now. Mandsford 13:51, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable, no reliable sources. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 14:13, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Thoroughly non-encyclopedic. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 02:57, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 06:51, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 06:51, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, Sadads (talk) 15:03, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.