Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yadgar Ismail

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:32, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yadgar Ismail[edit]

Yadgar Ismail (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Earlier versions [1] were better formatted and referenced, but this article has been tagged for notability and possible WP:COI since June 2015. I can find no indication that it meets notability standards. Derek Andrews (talk) 11:00, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:44, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:08, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:08, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. That's the first time I can recall seeing an absolutely empty Google Scholar profile. Regardless, we have no evidence for notability as an academic or of any other kind. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:13, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Zero notability. Why was this BLP allowed to be created? Xxanthippe (talk) 22:27, 14 August 2017 (UTC).[reply]
  • Delete. Agree, GS is a low-bound source and if an academic has an empty profile, it's pretty hard to claim notability. Agricola44 (talk) 22:12, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.