Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Y. V. Krishna Rao

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 00:05, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Y. V. Krishna Rao[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable politician who fails to satisfy either criterion provided by WP:NPOL a before search failed to turn up anything of substance. Celestina007 (talk) 20:58, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:58, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:58, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:58, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Not read this in detail. But, based on a quick search the works here worldcat, Google Books and the references here jstor1 and jstor2 seems like this article is worth retaining. Would be great to build the article to the next level of detail. Good luck. Ktin (talk) 22:58, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ktin, I did observe those, but the problem is WP:SIGCOV isn’t met. Celestina007 (talk) 23:14, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One could argue that just the entire repository of books will meet WP:SIGCOV. I might have to give a read in the next couple of days. Currently busy off-wiki. Good luck. Ktin (talk) 23:42, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Member of the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council, 1966–1978, passes NPOL. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 10:29, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Goldsztajn. Mccapra (talk) 02:38, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:NPOL as a state-level legislator. Additionally, Telugu-language coverage, while obviously quite difficult for me to find, does seem to exist: see e.g. this. A native speaker would likely find more. But the NPOL pass is sufficient to establish notability, so we need go no further. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:56, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.