Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xylos (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Xylos[edit]
- Xylos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not have significant coverage in WP:RS to satisfy WP:GNG. A one-paragraph mention as a "band to watch" is not multiple and is barely non-trivial, and the lack of any actual produced music at this point would suggest that they do not meet WP:MUSIC. Might be a case of WP:CRYSTAL, as their album is due out April 5, allegedly, which contradicts the one source given. The tour claim actually appears to be one-time and/or a couple of regional performances with the bands listed (i.e., the run with Efterklang was, per [1], "a short little run around the Northeast"), and also not all of that information can be sourced to WP:RS. Note: this article was previously deleted via AfD, but that was over five years ago, and WP:CSD#G4 likely does not apply. Kinu t/c 22:46, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - They do seem to have some buzz. But a search for coverage shows it is still rather thin. This may well change when they release an album so no prejudice to recreation if notability is achieved in the future. -- Whpq (talk) 15:37, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- Joaquin008 (talk) 16:29, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This article is an advert for a product to be released next April. We cannot tell whether the product will be notable, because that is in the future. In addition Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.--Toddy1 (talk) 11:10, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.