Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xombo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, anons discounted. Sandstein 16:56, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Xombo[edit]

This consulting firm fails WP:CORP and lacks non-trivial coverage by reliable third party publications. Spam? JBsupreme (talk) 06:26, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

I've added additional information and an article in the business journal for green power efforts. Rekutyn (talk) 06:52, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep! The article just needs to be expanded —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.211.9.142 (talk) 06:59, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Expanded with more information about services, business practices, community involvement, etc... May need some POV clean-up but probably not deletion. 24.19.208.223 (talk) 07:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As it stands it doesn't deserve a page. It reads like an ad and there really isn't much in the way of notability there. Alberon (talk) 08:17, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable company which also fails our verifiability criteria for reliable 3rd party sourcing. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:18, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You can do anything at Xombo.com... except have a Wikipedia article. Delete per Alberon and Jasynnash2. JuJube (talk) 23:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The unattainable is unknown at xombo.com. The only limit is yourself. Welcome. RFerreira (talk) 19:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.