Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xeelee technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Xeelee. No independent notability. (non-admin closure) Randykitty (talk) 18:42, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Xeelee technology[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This does not establish notability independent of Xeelee Sequence through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary TTN (talk) 23:40, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:50, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:50, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:50, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Xeelee. I understand even Xeelee might be non-notable - first step is organize the info then re-examine best solution - this is a complex web of articles. Has anyone notified the Wikia project, so they can copy the content? -- Green Cardamom (talk) 20:25, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Xeelee. I guess I'll go along with Green Cardamom on this. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:02, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.