Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xcos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Scilab. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:21, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Xcos[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, or at least not independently notable of Scilab. Only 2 of refs are reliable and both discuss it in context of Scilab. So no coverage of this alone. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 14:41, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Scicos or Scilab. The article was previously deleted due to an expired PROD. I redirected it to Scicos, which nobody has opposed. Let's keep it that way. --Ixfd64 (talk) 16:20, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree with a redirect; I was thinking of that when nominating, perhaps should have made it clearer.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 16:57, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Scilab. Unclear notability; the only independent ref (engineeringnewworld.com) is a blog, not strong enough to establish notability independent of the larger software package or developer. Scicos is also a reasonable merge target.Dialectric (talk) 17:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.