Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xbox 180

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 01:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Xbox 180[edit]

No references; information could be speculative. J Di ^talk 22:38, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's a hoax. TJ Spyke 23:02, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Confusing with xBox 360. Tonytypoon 19:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ATI RV530? Rather not. Saxbryn 23:16, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, speedy if possible. Ugh, definite hoax created by a sock of User:Nintendude. --Wafulz 00:58, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per above. It's only half the console of the 360! --tgheretford (talk) 01:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yes, 50% of the console, but 0% of the references. Dar-Ape 03:58, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question? if the user is a sockpuppet of someone who has an indefinite block could G5 apply or do they need to be specifically banned for that to be usable? If that is the case I would suggest speedy deletion if is not a regular deletion. I would have added it my self but I am unsure if G5 is valid in this case. --69.156.205.133 04:34, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do think tat G5 would apply. TJ Spyke 05:15, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just checked, and it says the user is a suspected sock puppet (not confirmed), so it might not. TJ Spyke 05:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unsourced crystal balling at best. —ShadowHalo 07:13, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless sourced. BMan1113VR 03:49, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 21:22, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Xbox, as many people in gaming circles use this as another name for the original Xbox (as opposed to stating "original Xbox"). This article, of course, is unsourced crystalballery. -- Kicking222 22:53, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- That's imho spreading wrong knowledge. It does not matter how an unknown amount of people nicknames a product unless it does not have an official name. Unless this expression has widely established, there is no reason to include it. A mere 15k of Google results, mostly referencing to the rumor about a hypothetical handheld device, should say enough. As for "original Xbox" or "old Xbox", these are also nothing but clumsy attemps to distinguish the two consoles. Saxbryn 09:27, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - hoax. --Scottie theNerd 12:46, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Delete because this may constitute to a hoax or keep if there are refrences.--PrestonH | talk | contribs | editor review | 21:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.