Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xanthe Bearman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:18, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Xanthe Bearman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found nothing at all to suggest better sourcing, notability and improvement with the best results here, here and here and finally there's no move target for this orphan that seemed to have been started by the subject (April 2008 and no significant changes since then). SwisterTwister talk 06:46, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:27, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:27, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:27, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 09:11, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. no clear evidence of notability , and there does not seem much likelihood of better sourcing DGG ( talk ) 22:41, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: non-notable; fails WP:GNG. Quis separabit? 20:41, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.