Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xanadu Quantum Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 23:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Xanadu Quantum Technologies[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:NCORP. Sources relating to routine funding ("a capital transaction, such as raised capital") do not contribute to notability, and nor do sources which are clearly not WP:INDEPENDENT. Coverage in a list of things to watch out for makes it way way TOOSOON. If and when it's notable, it will have independent reliably sourced coverage of its development(s). ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 10:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 10:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:01, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:02, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, EN-Jungwon 14:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I think the nomination has it right. Run-of-the-mill reporting is run-of-the-mill. XOR'easter (talk) 19:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As the initial editor mentioned, the sources do not meet WP:INDEPENDENT. This company does not meet Wikipedia's notability standards yet. Redoryxx (talk) 18:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Xanadu is as notable as other companies involved in the quantum computing industry, such as IonQ or Rigetti. JamesHunton (talk) 21:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.