Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XXXena
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 16:46, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
XXXena[edit]
- XXXena (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:PORNBIO, no indication the subject can meet the GNG or any other specialized guideline. Long-unsourced BLP, substub quality. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO. No awards or unique contributions, and coverage in mainstream press consists of a few passing mentions in articles about other subject. Props for the name, however. --RL0919 (talk) 21:48, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:20, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.