Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XS Malarkey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 03:16, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

XS Malarkey[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources found. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 03:08, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Well it certainly exists, as even a perfunctory search will show. And according to The Guardian here, and The Independent here, it's popular. AfD is not WP:CLEANUP, so it boils down to this: should comedy clubs be in Wikipedia? Back to The Grauniad, this time here; "Running a comedy club for a decade is quite an achievement in any circumstances, but outside London, on a shoestring, it really is something to be proud of." So, keep. Mr Stephen (talk) 08:48, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Reliable sources easily available if you look. I have found, and added sources from The Guardian and Time Out as well as a brief mention in The Metro. --Korruski (talk) 09:34, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Mr. Stephen and Korruski. Carrite (talk) 16:35, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I don't think the question is whether comedy clubs should be on Wikipedia, but whether this comedy club should be on Wikipedia. There, we find some sources to indicate that notability may exist, and that's sufficient. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 15:54, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.