Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XM.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:04, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

XM.com[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All references either press releases or trivial coverage. Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG as no independent, substantive coverage found. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:37, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buff bills 7701 03:05, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The references in the article are a mix of PR and unreliable sources, nor have I located anything better. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:NWEB. AllyD (talk) 10:36, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.