Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X3SR

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:34, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

X3SR[edit]

X3SR (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable group fails WP:BAND. No coverage found in reliable independent sources.  Philg88 talk 06:57, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Musicians-related deletion discussions.  Philg88 talk 07:00, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 10:37, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I listed 13 Sources from multiple countries, what else do you guys need? If my sources aren't good enough may I please have suggestions on what are. Also will getting sources from this list ( wikipedia org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Sources ) be deemed acceptable? Vlolv (talk) 15:03, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


  • Point taken thank you, the references I put though I don't think I put too much so that's ok I hope. The two REALLY, REALLY good ones I think are the newspaper references and consequence of sound. I hope that's enough if not then I guess I failed at this wikipedia thing and i'm sorry guys I gave it my best shot. Vlolv (talk) 19:19, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This band has six fairly good sources (sites that seem to have an editorial staff and somebody there to check the copy) as well as a lot of sources that are really off the mark. I've listed them at Talk:X3SR#References_for_this_article. I suggest that the badly sourced information simply be deleted and the well-sourced data be left in a vastly shortened article. When this band becomes world-famous then the article can be pumped up with other information from Rolling Stone or wherever. In the meantime, it seems to be Notable within the definition of WP:Band. GeorgeLouis (talk) 08:35, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank You

Removed the bad references and left the good ones, the reference in the southflorida.com website was the song PASSIONE itself. I linked it so you can hear it if you want. The reason why I put this is to show the public that if their song got used by a south florida newspaper as the backdrop for an NBA Finals reference, they have to count for something. Besides that I did word for word what has been told of me and will continue doing so. Thank you so much wikimasters! Vlolv (talk) 13:41, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • UPDATE I added another reference by popular publisher Dancing Astronaut[1]. Thanks again all of you for your help, i'm all ears to keep improving. Vlolv (talk) 17:38, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 16:41, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 20:48, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I thought this discussion was closed, it said keep. Can someone add to this? Or does it just stay like this forever ?Vlolv (talk) 19:12, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.